 | |

View Larger |
Rebels, Mavericks, and Heretics in Biology ( Yale University Press )
Release Date: 2008-06-19
Average Customer Rating:
List Price: $40.00
Price: $28.80 Eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping on orders over $25.
Availability: Usually ships in 24 hours
| Add to Cart |
|
|
Product Description
This book is the first devoted to modern biology’s innovators and iconoclasts: men and women who challenged prevailing notions in their fields. Some of these scientists were Nobel Prize winners, some were considered cranks or gadflies, some were in fact wrong. The stories of these stubborn dissenters are individually fascinating. Taken together, they provide unparalleled insights into the role of dissent and controversy in science and especially the growth of biological thought over the past century. Each of the book’s nineteen specially commissioned chapters offers a detailed portrait of the intellectual rebellion of a particular scientist working in a major area of biology--genetics, evolution, embryology, ecology, biochemistry, neurobiology, and virology as well as others. An introduction by the volume’s editors and an epilogue by R. C. Lewontin draw connections among the case studies and illuminate the nonconforming scientist’s crucial function of disturbing the comfort of those in the majority. By focusing on the dynamics and impact of dissent rather than on “winners” who are credited with scientific advances, the book presents a refreshingly original perspective on the history of the life sciences. Scientists featured in this volume: Alfred Russel Wallace Hans Driesch Wilhelm Johannsen Raymond Arthur Dart C. D. Darlington Richard Goldschmidt Barbara McClintock Oswald T. Avery Roger Sperry Leon Croizat Vero Copner Wynne-Edwards Peter Mitchell Howard Temin Motoo Kimura William D. Hamilton Carl Woese Stephen Jay Gould Thelma Rowell Daniel S. Simberloff
|
The Kimura Part ( jryskmpr )
Unfortunately, the Kimura section doesn't reflect new work in the history of mathematics, so it cannot explain the neutral theory as a piece of constructivist mathematics, which it is. The lineage is pretty straightforward: Kimura back to Malecot, back to Borel, the latter of whom was one of the early twentieth-century responders to issues raised by Cantorian set theory.
In other words, Kimura was a constructivist and we need to answer the question posed to all constructivist arguments: where is Kimura's constructivist intervention in his argument? Crow can't begin to answer this, because he's an old man, out of touch. He's still living in his memories. Wake up!
SRN-Paradox, Natural Mathematics, Relativity and Twentieth ...
Apr 18, 2006 ... Ryskamp, John Henry, "Paradox, Natural Mathematics, Relativity and Twentieth-Century Ideas" . Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract= ...
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=897085 - Similar pages
by J RYSKAMP - All 2 versions
|
|
|